If you need to worry about iterator invalidation it may be that you should be using an existing algorithm so that you do not need to modify the container’s contents directly.

You definitely need to understand invalidation however, if you want to an algorithm.

Rather, it defines a common API that may be used to discover, select and interact with such systems as well as with simpler content encryption systems.

Implementation of Digital Rights Management is not required for compliance with this specification: only the Clear Key system is required to be implemented as a common baseline.

The working group maintains a list of all bug reports that the editors have not yet tried to address; there are also open bugs in the previous bug tracker.

The container is extended by inserting new elements before the element at the specified position.

This is achieved by requiring content protection system-specific messaging to be mediated by the page rather than assuming out-of-band communication between the encryption system and a license or other server.

This is an experiment to test the difference between C iterator of STL vector and list affected by erase operation and list performs like real linked list.

The official saying or description about C iterators of vector and list are listed as follows: for list erase: Data races The container is modified. Concurrently accessing or modifying other elements is safe, although iterating ranges that include the removed elements is not.

If the capacity is increased, the whole block is reallocated, potentially changing its address, and so the addresses of all elements.

All iterators and references are invalidated, unless the inserted member is at an end (front or back) of the deque (in which case all iterators are invalidated, but references to elements are unaffected). Every iterator and reference after the point of erase is invalidated.